Skip to content
Start here
Verified data

Security & access: what changes when you switch

Security, offline and access rules that differ between Zapier and Make. Rows where both tools are the same (3) are left out; the full side-by-side is on each tool’s page: Zapier, Make.

What changesZapier (today)Make (after)
ISO/IEC 27001Not publishedCertifiedsource
HIPAA (BAA)Not supportedsourceNot published
Single sign-on (SAML/OIDC)YesTeamsourceYesEnterprisesource
SCIM user provisioningYesEnterprisesourceNot published
Two-factor authenticationYessourceYesEnforcement: Enterprisesource
Admin audit logYesTeamsourceYesEnterprisesource
Data residency choicesUS onlysourceUS, EUsource
EncryptionAES-256 at rest; TLS 1.2+ in transitsourceAES-256 full-disk encryption at rest (AWS KMS keys); TLS 1.2/1.3 in transitsource
Mobile appsNot publishediOS, Androidsource
IP allowlistingYessourceNot published
Editorial assessment

Before you cut over

  • Set up single sign-on in Make on Enterprise before you invite the team, so accounts are created through your identity provider rather than by hand.
  • If you restrict Zapier to office or VPN IP addresses today, check how you will enforce the same rule in Make; we found no IP allowlisting documented.

Checked September 19, 2026 against each vendor’s own trust center, help docs and app pages. Hover or tap “source” to see the exact wording we relied on. “Not published” means we could not find the vendor saying it on its own site; it doesn’t mean the feature is missing. Plan names are the lowest plan the vendor says includes the feature. Security · Offline · Remote vs office · Download the data

AUTOMATION TOOLS · MIGRATION GUIDE

Switching from Zapier to Make

Switching from Zapier to Make is a fully manual rebuild, not a migration, since the two platforms have no shared file format or official conversion tool between them.

Quick verdict: Worth it mainly for teams with complex, high-volume automations where Make’s operations-based pricing and visual branching logic pay for the rebuild effort over time; not worth it for a handful of simple Zaps.

Why teams switch from Zapier to Make

Operations-based pricing scales better for complex flows

Make charges per operation rather than per multi-step task, which can be significantly cheaper for automations with many steps per run.

Visual, branching workflow builder

Make’s canvas shows parallel branches and routers visually, making complex conditional logic easier to build and debug than Zapier’s more linear step list.

More granular error handling

Make offers built-in error handlers per module, giving finer control over retries and fallback paths than Zapier’s more limited auto-replay options.

Estimate · your inputs

Switching Cost & Friction Estimator

Estimate the real hidden cost of moving from Zapier to Make, not just the subscription price.

—
Estimated migration time
—
Data friction rating
—
Total hidden switching cost
Data mapping & cleaning labor—
Migration / cleaning tooling fees—
Team retraining overhead—
Switching friction buffer (10%)—
Assumes a blended $45/hr internal labor rate with no native importer available, so sequences/records are rebuilt largely by hand. Adjust the sliders to match your team.

How to migrate your data

Because there’s no import tool, plan this as a project with real engineering time, not a weekend task.

StepWhat happens
1Audit existing automationsList every Zapier zap/scenario along with its trigger, actions, and any filters or conditional logic, since there’s no export file that Make can read.
2Prioritize by business impactRank automations by how critical they are so revenue- or ops-critical workflows get rebuilt and tested first, not last.
3Rebuild triggers and actions manuallyRecreate each automation step-by-step inside Make, since Zapier and Make use incompatible internal formats with zero native import/export between them.
4Reconnect app credentialsRe-authenticate every connected app (CRM, email, spreadsheet, etc.) inside Make, as OAuth tokens and API keys don’t carry over from Zapier.
5Test each automation in parallelRun the rebuilt Make automation alongside the original Zapier one on real data until outputs match before relying on it.
6Retire the old automationTurn off or archive the Zapier version only after the Make rebuild has run cleanly for at least one full business cycle.
What Make’s importer doesn’t handle: There is no native interchange format between Zapier and Make — no import file, no official conversion tool. Every trigger, action, filter, and error handler has to be read from the old automation and rebuilt by hand in the new one.

Pricing during the transition

Here’s how Zapier and Make plans stack up, from free tier to the mid-market plan most switching teams land on.

PlanZapierMake
Free planFree: $0 — 100 tasks/month, two-step ZapsFree: $0 — 1,000 operations/month, 2 active scenarios
Entry paid tierProfessional: from $19.99/month billed yearly, depending on task tier, multi-step ZapsCore: $12/month billed annually ($16 monthly) for 10,000 credits, unlimited active scenarios
Mid tierTeam: from $69/month billed yearly, shared workflows for up to 25 usersPro: $21/month billed annually ($28 monthly) for 10,000 credits, priority execution and custom variables

Make’s module/operation-based pricing model doesn’t map cleanly onto Zapier’s task-based model, so estimate your typical monthly operation count on Make before committing to a tier.

Feature-parity checklist

The core trade-off is Zapier’s larger app library and simplicity versus Make’s cheaper scaling and visual complexity handling.

FeatureZapierMake equivalent
Visual workflow builderLinear, step-by-step Zap editorVisual canvas with branching and routers
App/connector library sizeLargest app library in the categoryLarge but somewhat smaller than Zapier’s
Error handling & retry logicBasic auto-replay on failuresPer-module error handlers and custom retry logic
Pricing modelPer-task pricing, can get expensive at scalePer-operation pricing, often cheaper for complex flows
Built-in AI/agent toolsAI fields and Zapier Agents on paid plansAI modules and custom functions on paid plans

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there any tool that converts Zaps into Make scenarios?

No, there’s no official or reliable third-party converter; every automation has to be manually rebuilt inside Make.

What is the ‘Zapier on Make’ module — does it migrate my Zaps?

No, that module lets a Make scenario call or trigger a Zapier automation as an integration bridge; it’s not a migration tool and doesn’t recreate Zaps as native Make scenarios.

How long does rebuilding a complex Zap usually take?

A multi-step Zap with filters and branching logic can take anywhere from 30 minutes to a few hours to rebuild and test properly in Make, depending on how many apps are involved.

Should we migrate everything at once or gradually?

Gradually: rebuild and validate your highest-priority automations first, keep both platforms running in parallel, and migrate the long tail of low-impact Zaps last (or not at all).

Will our API keys and webhooks still work?

Webhook URLs will change since Make generates its own endpoints, so any external system pointing at a Zapier webhook URL needs to be updated to Make’s new URL.

Sources

Prices on this page were recorded from each vendor’s own pricing page on the date shown at the top of the page. Vendors change pricing often — check the live source before you buy.

Every figure is also in our open dataset (JSON and CSV, CC BY 4.0), with its source page and verification date. See how we research pricing.

Cite this page: HelpCompare, “Switching from Zapier to Make: A Step-by-Step Migration Guide”, helpcompare.com/zapier-to-make-migration/ (updated ).

Source links on this site are checked every month; last check . How sources are checked.

Start with the job

Guides for the jobs this software does

Plain-language guides: the steps, what to check before you buy, common mistakes, and every tool it takes with verified prices.

Need sign-off?

Turn this into a one-page decision brief

Verified prices costed for your team size, a check against your must-have requirements, the questions to settle before you sign, and a source for every figure. Print it, or paste it into an email to whoever approves the spend.

Build a decision brief

From shortlist to switched

Built for the leader who owns the selection, answers for the spend, drives the rollout, and lives with the results. HelpCompare covers the whole decision, not just the first step.

Bill Belcamino, founder of HelpCompare
About the author

Bill Belcamino

Founder and author, HelpCompare

Engineer by training, operator by experience, marketer by choice. Bill spent eight and a half years as an engineer at HP, was COO of Auctiva (the number one third-party selling platform on eBay, past 200,000 users) and ran Google’s $70M/year search syndication partnership at Alot.com. Then he spent 13 years building his own web properties with his own money at stake. He has bought, trialled, integrated and cancelled more SaaS tools than he can count, and started HelpCompare because the real cost of switching tools is the part nobody covers.

“I’ve sat on both sides of the table: the agency recommending the tool and the client paying for it.”

Researched and fact-checked by the HelpCompare team. Pricing on this page was last verified on September 16, 2026. No paid sponsorships, no affiliate commissions.