Make is a polished, no-code visual automation builder for business users; n8n is open-source and self-hostable, node-based, and popular with technical and developer teams. Here is what each actually costs.
Choose Make for a polished no-code visual builder and the cheaper cloud entry price ($12 vs $20/mo); choose n8n for open-source flexibility, free self-hosting, or a technical team building AI-agent workflows.
| At a glance | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Workflow Automation | |
| Entry price | Core — From $12/mo (10,000 credits/mo, annual) | Starter — From $20/mo (2,500 executions/mo, annual) |
| Free plan | Free — 1,000 credits/mo, unlimited active scenarios not included, 3,000+ apps | No permanent free cloud plan — free trial only; free self-hosted open-source version on GitHub |
Make, at the cloud entry tier: $12/mo against n8n Cloud’s $20/mo, both billed annually. But n8n’s free self-hosted Community Edition has no per-execution cost at all if your team can run its own infrastructure — a real free option Make does not offer (Make’s free tier caps at 1,000 credits/mo and does not remove restrictions like unlimited active scenarios).
| Category | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price (cloud) | Core $12/mo (10,000 credits, annual) | Starter $20/mo (2,500 executions, annual) |
| Free plan | 1,000 credits/mo, restricted (no unlimited scenarios) | No permanent free cloud plan — trial only; free self-hosted version exists |
| Billing unit | Credits (most actions = 1 credit) | Full workflow executions, any number of steps |
| Self-hosting | Not offered | Yes — free, open-source Community Edition |
| Users included | Unlimited, on paid plans | Unlimited, on every plan including Starter |
| App connectors | 3,000+ apps | Every integration, all plans |
| Audience | No-code visual builder for business users | Node-based builder popular with developers and technical teams |
| AI features | AI Provider actions (may use more credits) | 2,300 AI Assistant credits/mo on Starter |
Verified September 23, 2026Prices recorded from each vendor’s own pricing page. See sources
Prices in USD from make.com/en/pricing and n8n.io/pricing, both checked September 23, 2026.
Editorial assessmentBoth are visual, node/scenario-based automation builders connecting hundreds of apps, but they target different teams and bill differently.
Make charges by credit, and most individual actions inside a scenario consume 1 credit each — a complex multi-step scenario can use many credits per run. n8n charges by full workflow execution, however many steps it contains, which n8n positions as fairer for complex automations: “pay for full executions, not for each step.”
n8n’s core product is open-source and fair-code licensed, with a free, self-hosted Community Edition available on GitHub — a real option for technical teams wanting zero per-execution cost on their own infrastructure. Make has no self-hosted or open-source option; every plan runs on Make’s cloud.
Make’s polished, drag-and-drop scenario builder targets business users who want automation without code. n8n’s node-based canvas, code-step support (JS/Python) and CLI/API control are built with developers and technical teams in mind, though it does not require coding to use.
Both figures are each vendor’s flat entry-tier cloud price (Make Core at 10,000 credits/mo; n8n Starter at 2,500 executions/mo, both annual) and do not scale with the number above. n8n also offers a free, self-hosted open-source edition not reflected here. Checked September 23, 2026.
You want a polished no-code builder for business users, the largest app-connector library, or the cheaper cloud entry price.
You want open-source flexibility, free self-hosting, or a builder suited to technical teams and AI-agent workflows.
Uses your selections above. Estimate excludes add-ons, overages, and negotiated discounts.
Make’s free plan and n8n’s free trial (or free self-hosted edition) both cost nothing to test. Build one real workflow in each before committing.
At the cloud entry tier, yes: $12/mo against $20/mo, both billed annually. n8n also offers a free, self-hosted open-source edition with no per-execution cost if you run your own infrastructure.
Yes — n8n’s Community Edition is open-source and free to self-host, with unlimited executions on your own infrastructure. Make has no self-hosted or open-source option.
Make bills by “credits,” where most individual actions inside a scenario cost 1 credit. n8n bills by full workflow execution, regardless of how many steps run inside it.
n8n — its node-based builder supports custom code steps (JS/Python), CLI and API control, and is popular for building AI-agent workflows. Make is built for a more no-code, business-user audience.
Step-by-step migration guides covering what transfers automatically, what doesn’t, and how to handle the gap — in both directions.
Every “best workflow automation tool” listicle tells you why to buy. Here’s the other half: the specific conditions under which Make or n8n is the wrong purchase for your team.
Buy Make if:
Do NOT buy Make if:
Buy n8n if:
Do NOT buy n8n if:
Every pricing fact, rating, AI billing model and switching guide we hold on each tool, on one page, with the date each figure was last verified.
Prices on this page were recorded from each vendor’s own pricing page on the date shown at the top of the page. Vendors change pricing often — check the live source before you buy.
Every figure is also in our open dataset (JSON and CSV, CC BY 4.0), with its source page and verification date. See how we research pricing.
Plain-language guides: the steps, what to check before you buy, common mistakes, and every tool it takes with verified prices.
Verified prices costed for your team size, a check against your must-have requirements, the questions to settle before you sign, and a source for every figure. Print it, or paste it into an email to whoever approves the spend.
Built for the leader who owns the selection, answers for the spend, drives the rollout, and lives with the results. HelpCompare covers the whole decision, not just the first step.